Eduard – Gene kim devops – Рдуард Кабринский
Gene kim devops
[youtube]
Gene kim devops News highlights Gene kim devops
The Three Ways: The Principles Underpinning DevOps
In this blog post, I talk about the “Three Ways,” which are the principles that all of the DevOps patterns can be derived from, which we’re using in both the “DevOps Handbook” and “The Phoenix Project: A Novel About IT, DevOps, and Helping Your Business Win.” We assert that the Three Ways describe the values and philosophies that frame the processes, procedures, practices of DevOps, as well as the prescriptive steps.
It has been especially fun working on this with fellow co-author Mike Orzen, the most recent winner of the cherished Shingo Prize for his contribution to operational excellence for his book “Lean IT.”
The Three Ways are as follows. In a future blog post, I’ll describe the DevOps patterns that can be derived from each.
The First Way emphasizes the performance of the entire system, as opposed to the performance of a specific silo of work or department — this as can be as large a division (e.g., Development or IT Operations) or as small as an individual contributor (e.g., a developer, system administrator).
The focus is on all business value streams that are enabled by IT. In other words, it begins when requirements are identified (e.g., by the business or IT), are built in Development, and then transitioned into IT Operations, where the value is then delivered to the customer as a form of a service.
The outcomes of putting the First Way into practice include never passing a known defect to downstream work centers, never allowing local optimization to create global degradation, always seeking to increase flow, and always seeking to achieve profound understanding of the system (as per Deming).
The Second Way is about creating the right to left feedback loops. The goal of almost any process improvement initiative is to shorten and amplify feedback loops so necessary corrections can be continually made.
The outcomes of the Second Way include understanding and responding to all customers, internal and external, shortening and amplifying all feedback loops, and embedding knowledge where we need it.
The Third Way is about creating a culture that fosters two things: continual experimentation, taking risks and learning from failure; and understanding that repetition and practice is the prerequisite to mastery.
We need both of these equally. Experimentation and taking risks are what ensures that we keep pushing to improve, even if it means going deeper into the danger zone than we’ve ever gone. And we need mastery of the skills that can help us retreat out of the danger zone when we’ve gone too far.
The outcomes of the Third Way include allocating time for the improvement of daily work, creating rituals that reward the team for taking risks, and introducing faults into the system to increase resilience.
In my follow-up book, The Unicorn Project, I revisit Parts Unlimited and describe my learnings through the Five Ideals.
Most Recent Articles
Comments
DM Colburn says
I applaud Gene Kim for his contribution to the DevOps transformation effort. These 3 principles offer a valuable focus for evolving the culture change requirements that are the core challenge for embedding a DevOps value system. I do have a suggestion for discussion that may serve to enhance the value of these 3 principles.
The focus on “Systems Thinking” is a concern, if we all agree that the biggest challenge to DevOps is changing current culture, values and rewards thinking. Wouldn’t the focus on developing and managing “systems” support an internal IT-centric perspective? Wouldn’t a focus on Dev and Ops co-designing “Services” better support a business-focused perspective on the value of IT? I submit that integrating the core values of DevOps into the IT Service Lifecycle would most certainly be better served by a вЂservice’ focus for the 3 principles.
For internal IT departments to remain relevant there must be a change in how the business values IT. IT must evolve from a вЂcost center’ or вЂspend-only’ department, to a вЂservice provider’ or вЂcontributing’ department. To be successful IT must be capable of demonstrating value in the same way, and at the same valuation points business departments use to demonstrate their value (i.e. optimizing business process.)
Business department leaders are inherently familiar with and experienced in quantifying (valuing) вЂservices’. вЂSystems’ on the other hand, are more
commonly recognized as the purview of IT or manufacturing-related departments. Manufacturing-related departments however, have evolved a more mature capability to quantify their value in support of core business process. IT departments are struggling to evolve this same capability.
DevOps is a critical paradigm shift required for IT to evolve the capability to value its services in a way business department leaders understand. Building serviceability, availability, reliability and service level quantifiability into the business process automation services IT designs, transitions, operates and continually improves, requires integrating development and operations as a single discipline functioning in all phases of the Service Lifecycle.
For this reason I wonder if it would be more вЂIT Transformation’ supportive to include the concept of DevOps co-developing services as a core principal, avoiding the possibility the вЂsystems’ perspective in the First Way above, would be seen as perpetuating the internal IT focus for DevOps, as opposed to a business-focused вЂservice’ perspective.
My intent is to facilitate discussions on this point, to enhance, not be critical of the value Gene has offered with these principles.
Hi DM, you are certainly a better politician than I am. Though I don’t “want” to be critical, I think the discussion could be most useful if we are presented a view that while acknowledges the вЂpotential’ of the вЂThree Ways’, it focuses a bit more on what it is we are trying to вЂtransform’, why it is seen as вЂbroken’, and what are perhaps the вЂreal’ cultural and financial reasons for it being вЂbroken’ and in need of вЂtransformation’ in the first place.
DevOps facilitates the process by building (via code) the conduits between the developer and customers through вЂcontinual integration’; connectivity between вЂmonitoring triggers and events’ and the organization’s вЂticketing’ systems; and advanced configuration management and/or complete вЂcontainerization’ of deployable environments, among other job descriptors. Operations just needs get on board and/or get out of the way.
I know a lot about DevOps because that is what I and my company do for many large and small organizations. And, we are paid quite well for our efforts. And, I don’t want to bite the hand that feeds me. But, a lot of what I do is so successful and/or so вЂnecessary’ partially due to failed politics and/or the organization’s lacking or non-existent procedures: not necessarily due to the вЂstrength’ of the вЂThree Ways’ or any other philosophical sound bites.
To the extent that “DevOps” can be viewed as вЂgetting Operations to be more like Development’, then we understand why the nature of the вЂService Desk’ has become replaced by on an automated and/or вЂSelf-Service’ model. Developers rely on user/customer feedback and restful вЂPUT’ of crash and stack trace output into a вЂcontinual improvement system’, whereby defects can be detected, presumably corrected, and released back to the customer in record time.
If only through sheer numbers, and given their equal weight in the discussion, start-ups and smaller companies with fewer products, few, if any вЂmission critical customer services’, fewer processes and employees, who adopt the вЂAgile’ method, can point to quick development and few вЂcatastrophic’ failures as proof their вЂThree Ways’ end-to-end, continual feedback, risk taking and reward yielding culture is an unwavering success.
Larger organizations with significant multiples in the number of products and employees, and a few absolutely вЂmission critical’ services only need to вЂonboard’ this leaner DevOps mentality and their IT will be sufficiently вЂtransformed’.
In the вЂFirst Way’, I am a strong believer in the IT professional’s need to understand their вЂsystem’, or ecosystem, from end-to-end. However, as the number of ecosystems grow along with complexity of each ecosystem, the advantage and/or sustainability of any single person or group вЂunderstanding’ each and every ecosystem at a sufficiently вЂproficient’ level becomes daunting, at best. Thus, larger organizations begin to pare down the expectations as to вЂwhat to know’, and the ability therefore to determine вЂdefects’ or вЂdegradation’ in others’ ecosystems becomes haphazard, at best.
In the вЂSecond Way’, a fully staffed and functioning Service Desk can act as a clearinghouse of feedback from systems, developers, testers, operators and end-users. However, the difficulty, both politically and economically, of implementing such a Service Desk continues to be a major impediment to providing timely and accurate feedback for larger and smaller organizations.
Mostly from the cultural and political spheres: boutique developers and their product managers “can’t be bothered” with complaints and system faults when it is not directly related to their product’s offerings. And, getting вЂproof’ of that relationship is not always: it requires said developers and managers to agree to investigate in an honest and open manner and to admit fault when it is found.
Thus, the Service Desk’s deciphering and escalating critical issues are often left to those without the proper skill set, knowledge of the many systems, or political authority to execute on their mission, making their вЂlack of effectiveness’ a self-fulfilling prophecy. Again, this lends unfair credence to the notion that the automated and вЂself-service’ model is the only reliable and cost effective feedback model.
In the вЂThird Way’, I won’t even discuss here whether an effective вЂchange management’ system could not only mitigate risk, but could eliminate the need for вЂrisk taking’ entirely. I will touch on whether your electronic check deposit should be considered with the same вЂweight’ of service responsibility as, say, your вЂFacebook like’ of your Mexican dinner, or say, a successful Uber reservation for a car service.
Obviously, being able to discover and overcome the вЂunknown’ in a timely manner requires taking on some risks. But, the risk that some вЂFacebook likes’ are missed is entirely different than the risks that some вЂbank deposits’ aren’t made.
Not dwelling on exactly what we mean by risk, I’d also argue that, again, quite frankly, only the вЂDeveloper’ can gain by risk taking. And, this is a cultural phenomenon found in both вЂnon-Transformed’ and вЂfully Transformed’ IT shops. More accurately, the risk/reward system is only geared towards rewarding the Developer. The only вЂrisk’ Operations can take that doesn’t backfire is to say вЂNo’, so she might live to see another day.
When Developers take risks that fail, it merely appears that something that was previously broken is not fixed; or a new вЂfeature’ is not yet available. The Developer will get another crack, or two, at it, or as many as needed until the вЂthingy’ works. Yet, Operations has to deal with the added inconvenience and risks associated with maintaining the faulty product. When Developers finally вЂget it right’, they get all the accolades. All Operations gets is a little less headache and less risk in maintaining the product and the financial and hierarchical benefits likewise, flow to the Development groups and rarely to Operations..
When Operations takes risks that fail, customers lose confidence in the product, the organization loses business, and people lose their jobs. When Operations takes risks that are successful, the accolades flow to the Developer for вЂcoming up with the solution’, and the financial and hierarchical benefits likewise, flow to the Development groups and rarely to Operations.
Thus, the вЂreal’ reason why DevOps is a success, at least partially, is that we are now seeing вЂdevelopers’ in the Operations role. And, now engineering and product managers have a certain vested interest in their вЂDeveloper Operator’ in a manner they never had before in their вЂSystem Administrator Operator’. I’d say the only and persistent gap continues to be in rewarding (compensation of) the risk takers: DevOps engineers have fared only marginally better than their Administrator Operator predecessors.
To conclude, I am all for вЂAgile’ and the вЂThree Ways’. They are exciting and promising ways of approaching IT and Service delivery. However, the day Operators and Service Desk staff are compensated like Developers; and the day the Service Desk is staffed with actual Developers and top-notch вЂDevOps’ engineers: that is the the day the вЂThree Ways’ can be anything other than a quaint notion befitting a startup with few products and no mission critical services.
Erick Hagstrom says
You seem to conflate “Systems Thinking” with the “systems” that IT builds, maintains and operates. In fact, “systems thinking” is a discipline completely distinct from IT, and the systems about which we think are frequently human in nature. Wikipedia can give you a good start in understanding the meaning of “Systems Thinking”, though the Waters Foundation does it more succinctly: http://watersfoundation.org/systems-thinking/what/.
I noticed “tools” were not one of the ways. Comments anyone? I’ll look for other articles on the tools versus process/culture topic as well.
Steve Speicher says
Tools only help (or hurt) with the 3 principles. If you consider for example the 3rd principle, many customers would look for tools/products/solutions to help with this experimentation and repetitiveness. The simple way I would think of this is by leveraging a simple and fast way to onboard developers, such a Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) like OpenShift. In addition, it allows for native continuous integration and deployment (repetitive). These can be enhanced by a number of 3rd part systems such as Jenkins, Shippable, ContinuousCI, etc
imno haree says
These references are only for the advanced. They are highly cryptic and you must provide your credit card details for the secrets of DevOps and other secrets of the universe to exposed to you in all their glory. Please first read the Phoenix Project for amateur standard DevOps before you can decode the black art contained within these links.
jual crystal x di depok feel grateful to find an article about this DevOps
Jason McSpacin says
ironically we are not grateful for jual crystal x di depok at all. In fact i’d liken it to SpamOps, which is a very well practiced craft for polluting the internet and trying to sell us crap that would never really be delivered anyway.
This article has given a little more knowledge of the jual crystal x di depok surrounding The Principles underpinning DevOps
Jock Spicer says
i found the link above only gave me the first way and therefore is not true devops.
I am now reading the first chapter of “The DevOps Toolkit”. And this term that Gene really loves “The Three Ways” appears all over. First, it is not the same as described here – since if I understand correctly System Thinking was changed with Flow.
Here and there in the text appears “First Way”, “Second Way”, “Third Way”, bla bla … I just think it is a very very poor choice to refer to named principles like this. I never remember what does first/second/third mean and it is very distracting. In most of the other books that I actually learned a lot from, there are distinct names for principles – and these names are used and re-used without giving them numbers or letters or whatever, unless their initials fit well into an acronym.
Would you agree that Gene needs to follow each Way Number with its name, or am I just being unreasonable?
Erick Hagstrom says
I agree that “First Way”, etc. is not a very helpful naming convention. It’s like naming your variables A1, A2, etc. (Excuse me a moment while I shudder at the memory of having to produce working code in BASIC.)
As for the First Way, both the formulations you mention are equivalent. Systems Thinking is all about optimizing the system, streamlining it, making it more reliable, etc. Improving it. What happens when you do those things to a system that manages the “Flow” of work from business needs to services that deliver business value? You end up optimizing the flow, streamlining it, making it more reliable, etc. Improving it. Systems Thinking is how you approach the system, better Flow is the result of improving it.
I agree. And in fact, I have already begun to translate the “three ways” in my head into the following 3 words he uses for them:Flow, Feedback, Experimentation. But I may modify that based on the excellent comment by @erick_hagstrom:disqus . Maybe I’ll say System Thinking, Feedback, Experimentation. Anything is better than learning a new trinity. That feels like joining a cult. And I don’t like cults. I don’t want to get my teams to drink the coolaid. I want them to think and learn. But I do like the authors and their ideas. So I’m not throwing the baby out with the bathwater. I’m just going to downplay the “Three Ways” thing. Thanks for highlighting this. It was bugging me too, but I had not examined it until you replied.
Bennett Elder says
Scientists have no trouble referring to Newton’s 3 laws of motion directly by number. Surely us business and tech people that have port numbers and command line syntax and acronyms memorized can remember the three ways to accomplish the Goal.
It took me a bit to learn them. The book that The Phoenix Project is based on, The Goal by Eliyahu M. Goldratt, helped a great deal. It is a bit corny at times… but it’s a great way to solidify the concepts of the three ways.
“The Phoenix Project” seems to imply that “security” is nothing but an a roadblock. Might this book have been written a few years ago before the world realized that security has been an afterthought…if any thought was put into it at all?
My impression of the book was that security put efforts on regulatory compliance issues that did not need solving on it side. DevOPS on the other hand encourages that security is everyone’s concern. My impression.
The Phoenix Project framed security not as a set of regulations that needed to follow, but rather a sort of value that needed to be delivered. Security testing and compliance was not a list of boxes to check off, but rather followed the same ideas and processes practiced throughout the book. Those boxes still need to be checked off from a legal standpoint, of course. But from an industry(ial) standpoint, security needs to be treated and tested just like normal code, and is as much a piece of value as the UI is.
The biggest challenge no one has mentioned, at least as far as I read in the comments is your customers. It’s all very well being able to iterate quickly, but in my experience customers never want to put that much effort in. They are all about doing the job they are paid to do that just happens to use the software your wrote and provided. We release on a steady scheduled 8 week cycle a new test version and allow 3 weeks for customers to test and feedback, followed by a new build for penetration testing and then a week after an RTM build for production. I can tell you that we are extremely lucky to get more than 1 customer who will actively feedback during the allotted 3 week period despite the dates for all versions within the year being known upfront. Of course when it goes RTM all customers want to install it on their test system first before going live with it.
Brian Wawok says
This is the wonder of SaaS. You just upgrade every day. The user had no choice ?? 8 week cycles for desktop software is just too slow.
…or you upgrade your desktop software automatically, like Google Chrome or Spotify.
That’s not the way businesses work. Consumer software like chrome sure, but where you have to upgrade a database before pushing the software and the customer will not accept that in production before they have tried it on their test system it’s a complete other ball gave. I’d love to say rough just have the latest and we’ll release a new version to fix any issues is simply not something that business will accept.
A lot of businesses today who buy into a SAAS model do accept it.
Take Salesforce.com for example. Major upgrades are pushed three times a year, period. Patch upgrades are deploy at least once a week. As far as I know, there is no way to opt out.
Migrating existing products to a SAAS model when there is already low-trust could certainly be a problem, but a great many businesses will and do accept the model, when presented properly.
As the original poster said, customers never want to put that much effort in — but trust is essential.
I guess these people have never worked in local government before then.
I agree to Peter. Other than core IT businesses like salesforce, chrome etc, there is lot of resistance from customers for every week or every month upgrade. Idealistically, process works but practically challenges in government are numerous
Aaron Surty says
I completely agree. I wish there was a handbook for ISVs writing enterprise software for on premise use.
It is web software not desktop. For desktop software it would be mega fast. You are thinking of things like a browser, but business customers and business software there is no way they will go that fast.
As a SaaS provider telcos also have issues accepting direct to live software changes. not least as no SaaS testing is done in the same e2e environment and where the client is the ultimate responsible of the service level to the end customer. What ends up happening is continuous testing that has significant extra costs.
Brian Turnwald says
I’ve found the best way to get feedback to to proactively ask for it in person or on a call. When I email or put something “out there” and ask them to test, it never gets done. Customers love to provide feedback, but don’t make them work for it. Make it easy!
Thank you for sharing this model. I will adapt it for our social innovation project to learn resolving generational poverty in a durable manner. Armentekort.be
Gary Williams says
This article annoys me. Why? Because it’s 100% right and yet devops today is associated with automation, the cloud and “devops engineers”. Not one of them understands the three ways.
I just transitioned away from a “DevOps Engineer” role because not only was it not these three ways, it wasn’t even your “automation, the cloud…”, it was just Operations++
Gary Williams says
“operations++” – I like that phrase. I hope you don’t mind if I steal it for use in meetings?
Bennett Elder says
Operations++? So like a Site Reliability Engineer just getting started, before they start statistically analyzing log data? ??
That reeducation is part of the journey. I’m constantly having to show that it is a cultural and technical mindset, not a specific role or tool.
Bennett Elder says
That’s mainly because people associate the buzzword with concepts they’ve been fed by marketers, not by practitioners in the field. Uncertain yet if MS renaming their collaboration and work delivery tool as Azure DevOps is going to hurt or to help matters. So far it’s at least seemed like a boon to my quest to spread these practices and concepts where I work.
Btw, this page has been one of my startup tabs for longer than I can remember. It regrounds me in the concepts I need to use in the coming day. Probably the closest I’ve gotten to meditation anytime recently.
I don’t see why DevOps would exclude proactive automation and simplification. Peter Merel calls these The Zeroth Way Of DevOps.
Nilesh Thali says
Six years late to the party, but… are these really three “ways” or three layers/steps? Three ways imply three different paths to getting to the same thing.
Johny Thinker says
I’m also conflicting a bit with that issue. English is not my native language, perhaps it makes sense for a English native?
Bennett Elder says
They are three steps. Without thinking about the 1st way, the 2nd way can lead to local optimizations that don’t have an important impact on the whole system. The continual experimentation and learning of the 3rd way requires the shorter feedback loops of the 2nd way. It’s something that’s meant to be thought of in steps for sure.
George Nicholson III says
I’m reading the Phoenix Project now and find this fascinating. I’ve had execs asking me about implementing “DevOps tools and processes” and I keep telling them that DevOps is more about adopting and committing to a culture and set of values than just tools and processes to add to your disfunctional IT area. The “3 ways” are presented in such a lofty and philosophical way, like guidance from a Kung Fu master, which makes it difficult to sell to corporate execs who want to check boxes and measure the results of precise action plans rather than change their thinking.
Bennett Elder says
I really like the Capabilities to Drive Improvement section in Accelerate (https://itrevolution.com/book/accelerate/). It outlines exactly which practices folllow the 3 ways and are shown to improve IT performance.
Thanks, for the article Gene. IMHO there is still huge human factor impact here you cannot well automate..
Natalie Sanelyte | Digital Reviewer | easybuilder.pro
Thanks for the information regarding Devops
Amazing write up, never read such an informative blog and enjoyed it. Thankyou. Keep up the good work. Looking forward to read more.
it is written very nicely and is optimized
Nice Information for me And I hope you would write the next article.
Keep doing awesome. Looking forward read more.
feel appreciative to discover an article about this DevOps
Nice Article and hope to keep writing again. thanks so much for sharing this article.
Really Very Informative Post , Thanks For Sharing The Information With Us.
Thanks For Sharing The Information regards, vesti dana.
Thanks for sharing the best information for me.
Very Nice Article and hope to keep sharing more information and once again thank You so much for sharing this article.
Gene kim devops
Gene kim devops
[youtube]
Gene kim devops New Gene kim devops
Gene kim devops
The Three Ways: The Principles Underpinning DevOps In this blog post, I talk about the “Three Ways,” which are the principles that all of the DevOps patterns can be derived from, which we’re
Gene kim devops
Gene kim devops Gene kim devops Gene kim devops
SOURCE: Gene kim devops Gene kim devops Gene kim devops
#tags#[replace: -,-Gene kim devops] Gene kim devops#tags#[/b]
[b]Eduard Kabrinskiy[/b]
[url=http://remmont.com]today’s news headlines[/url]
PikievDag on
You are welcome in ainsider poker, where you’ll take part in new tournaments and be cheerful! Generally, people don’t like playing poker, but on the link, you can find the best poker tips. Today you could save web poker bot and find very fast info about winning hours and software.
On ainsider.poker guys can search a video poker bot. This poker bot is very helpful and men all over the world may search Holdem texas poker tips. You may save Pluribus poker bot on private laptop or download different information to your private device and follow about everything. If you don’t know where to download bot poker, you could visit the link [url=https://aisider.poker/]poker tips[/url] here.
A lot of clients from the Canada and France playing online poker in their free time. Champions could find very useful rules on the link. How you may know, in web poker guys are playing a lot of time. Some users like to use the best digital poker slots, which give PlaySon, Amatic, and other companies. Usually, tips winning poker support users to win.
If you want to win in a bot poker game, you may understand that the program for poker will maintain you. At the moment programming poker bot support men and clients can play to poker slots for free. It is the best solution, why newbies don’t have an experience. They could play without risk and be happy, that any games providing for them for free. If you don’t know how to win, you should find any strategy. A lot of users which are playing digital poker find some steps on how to win.
If you want to start the game, a free bot for poker could be interested in you. It has any of opportunities how to win. Poker is a very interesting card game, where the leading task is to win by the rate, using 2 or 5 cards. In some situations, the player could force rival to stop. In our days digital poker game is the main game, which is playing in EU countries. In European cities in every casino, you can search a poker game. A lot of poker users are very skilled. You could use poker helper [url=https://aisider.poker/]my poker bot telegram[/url] and understand any of stages of the game.
Any time users wish to find winning tips for poker, but they don’t know how it does to. Cool way to utilize google sources or find the website, where probable to analyze poker rooms and the actions of the opponent. Anyway, poker game members can be divided into two sections: tournaments and basic games. If you desire to win in a tournament, you should use poker helper online. Currently, telegram bot poker is a very useful tool for many users!
Marcolof on
Congratulations, you have won $ 1000 in the lottery! Take the money —> 4erteg.ru
[url=http://4erteg.ru/]Detail[/url]: [url=http://4erteg.ru/]http://4erteg.ru/[/url] http://4erteg.ru/ http://4erteg.ru/
NezabudkaJep on
Ошибка: Dropped index http://schema.org/Movie
IsaacradiA on
базы для хрумера для досок объявлений
Вы занимаетесь продвижением сайтов? Тогда вам к нам. [url=https://goo.su/4zRx]Наша группа в телеграмме[/url]. У нас вы можете выбрать любую нужную для вашей работы базу для прогонов Xrumer и GSA, allsubmitter по разной ценовой категории.база для хрумера купить
Elizabethlab on
[b]Кабринский Эдуард – Azure artifacts pricing – Eduard Kabrinskiy
Azure artifacts pricing[youtube]
Azure artifacts pricing Top news headlines Azure artifacts pricing
Pricing for Azure DevOps1 Free Microsoft-hosted CI/CD
1 Free Self-Hosted CI/CD
1 Microsoft-hosted job with 1,800 minutes per month for CI/CD and 1 self-hosted job with unlimited minutes per month
$40 per extra Microsoft-hosted CI/CD parallel job and $15 per extra self-hosted CI/CD parallel job with unlimited minutes
1 free parallel job with 1,800 minutes
$40 per extra parallel job with unlimited minutes
1 free parallel job with unlimited minutes
$15 per extra parallel job with unlimited minutes
2 GiB free,
Industry-leading NuGet Server Support for Maven, npm, and Python packages Upstream sources to help protect open-source dependancies Integrated with Azure Pipelines Sophisticated access controlsthen starting at $2 per GiB
1,800 minutes free with 1 free parallel job
$40 per parallel job with unlimited minutes
First 2 GB free
$0 /extra gigabyte
$2 /extra gigabyte
$1 /extra gigabyte
$0.5 /extra gigabyte
$0.25 /extra gigabyte
1 free parallel job with unlimited minutes
$15 per extra parallel job with unlimited minutes
0 – 2 GiB = Free 2 – 10 GiB = $2 per GiB 10 – 100 GiB = $1 per GiB 100 – 1,000 GiB = $0.5 per GiB 1,000+ GiB = $0.25 per GiB
First 5 users free,
Azure Pipelines: Includes the free offer from INDIVIDUAL SERVICES Azure Boards: Work item tracking and Kanban boards Azure Repos: Unlimited private Git repos Azure Artifacts: 2 GiB free per organizationthen $6 per user per month
First 5 users free
Basic + Test Plans
$52 per user
Includes all Basic plan features Test planning, tracking & execution Browser-based tests with annotation Rich-client test execution User acceptance testing Centralized reportingper month
First 5 users free
Azure DevOps for Open SourceChoose the plan that’s right for you: Azure Pipelines if your team just needs CI/CD or choose the Bundle to get more services for your open source project.
10 Free parallel jobs
10 Free parallel jobs with unlimited minutes per month, 1 Free for Microsoft-hosted CD/CI parallel job with up to 1800 minutes per month and 1 Free for Self-hosted CD/CI parallel job with unlimited minutes per monthfor public projects
First 5 users free,
Azure Pipelines: 10 Free parallel jobs with unlimited minutes per month, 1 Free for Microsoft-hosted CD/CI parallel job with up to 1800 minutes per month and 1 Free for Self-hosted CD/CI parallel job with unlimited minutes per month Azure Boards: Work item tracking and Kanban boards Azure Repos: Unlimited private Git repos Azure Artifacts: 2 GiB free Azure DevOps is included with Visual Studio Subscriptionsthen $6 per user per month
Visual Studio subscribers get free access to Azure DevOps.
Subscribers get access to any number of organizations and don’t count against your 5 free users.
Compare features Product and Features Stakeholders (Free) Basic Basic + Test plans Open Source Create and edit work items, including bugs, requirements, and tasks Available Available Available Available Search and query work items Available Available Available Available View backlog and boards Available Available Available Available Set alerts and get notified about changing work items Available Available Available Available Provide feedback Available Available Available Available Request feedback Not available Available Available Available Agile tools (Kanban boards, backlogs, sprint planning, portfolio management) Not available Available Available Available Create new work item tags Not available Available Available Available Delivery plans Not available Available Available Available Unlimited Git repositories Not available Available Available Available Connect to your code using Xcode, Eclipse, InteliJ, Android Studio, Visual Studio, Visual Studio Code, and more Not available Available Available Available Centralized version control with Team Foundation Version Control, including Code Review Not available Available Available Available Powerful semantic code search Not available Available Available Available Continuous integration and deployment Available Available Available Available Approve releases Available Available Available Available Store 2 GiB free in artifacts Available Available Available AvailableAzure Test Plans
Exploratory testing Available Available Available Available Create and manage Test Plans Not available Not available Available Available Web-based test execution from Test Runner Not available Available Available Available Add and run tests from the Kanban board Not available Available Available AvailableView charts, widgets, dashboards, and wikis Available Available Available Available Create charts, configure widgets, set up dashboards, and write wikis Not available Available Available Available
Extensions Marketplace
Access 1,000+ extensions or create your own.
We guarantee at least 99.9% availability of Azure DevOps Services for paid Azure DevOps Services users, including users with paid User-Based Extensions to Azure DevOps Services, to access the associated Azure DevOps Services organization.
We guarantee at least 99.9% availability to execute load testing operations using the paid Azure Test Plans Load Testing Service.
We guarantee at least 99.9% availability to execute build and deployment operations using the paid Azure Pipelines.
Availability is calculated over a monthly billing cycle.
Frequently asked questions
Do I need a credit card to start using Azure DevOps?
For more information about other Azure services check out the Azure Services page.
Yes! Our friendly team is ready to chat with you if you need something. View the Azure DevOps Services support page to get started.
Azure artifacts pricing Azure artifacts pricing[youtube]
Azure artifacts pricing Recent news stories Azure artifacts pricing
Azure artifacts pricingExplore the different Azure DevOps pricing options for open source projects, small teams, and teams of all sizes.
Azure artifacts pricing
Azure artifacts pricing Azure artifacts pricing Azure artifacts pricing
SOURCE: Azure artifacts pricing Azure artifacts pricing Azure artifacts pricing
#tags#[replace: -,-Azure artifacts pricing] Azure artifacts pricing#tags#[/b]
[b]Кабринский Эдуард[/b]
[url=http://remmont.com]latest news[/url]
HarryMig on
You commit an error. Let’s discuss. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
[url=https://imaxoderm.com]imaxoderm.com[/url]
Victorvillelab on
[youtube]
Azure devops publish nuget package Headlines today Azure devops publish nuget package
Azure devops publish nuget packageWalkthrough
How To
Reference
Release Notes
Contribute
NuGet
How to publish NuGet Packages to MyGet from Azure DevOps Pipelines
MyGet Package Management works great with the continuous integration tools your team already uses, such as Azure DevOps Pipelines.
In this guide, we will cover how to publish a NuGet build artifact package from an Azure DevOps Pipeline build to a private feed in MyGet. From there, you can safely share your package with your team, make it available for future builds via MyGet’s NuGet API endpoints, and track package statistics like download count, version promotion history, and more.
You can configure your Azure DevOps Pipeline to publish packages to MyGet by adding NuGet build tasks to the pipeline configuration with the Azure DevOps UI or by adding a YAML file with the correct parameters to the root of your project’s source code repo.
Note: If you are building an app with .NET Core or .NET standard packages, you should use a .NET Core task instead of the NuGet task shown in the example below. The .NET Core task has full support for all package scenarios currently supported by dotnet, including restore, pack, and nuget push.
NuGet build tasks
Step 1. Create a new feed in MyGet that you would like to serve as your target package repository on MyGet. Navigate to the “Feed Details” menu from the left, and identify the values unique to your feed under “Push NuGet Packages to” and “API key.”
Step 2. In a new tab or window, open Azure DevOps Pipelines and navigate to the project you would like to integrate with MyGet, or optionally create a new project.
Step 3. From the Project Settings menu, select “Service connections” and click “Create Service Connection. For this example, we will be setting up our Azure DevOps pipeline to push NuGet artifacts to MyGet, so select “NuGet” from the service connection options, and click “Next.”
Step 4. Set up a new NuGet service connection using the ApiKey authentication method. Copy the Feed URL and API Key from the Feed Details tab of your target MyGet feed and paste into the New NuGet service connection dialogue. Give the service connection a meaningful name; you will use this name to refer your MyGet API settings when setting up NuGet build tasks later.
Step 5. Now that you have set up your MyGet service connection, navigate to your project’s Pipelines tool and select the pipeline whose build artifacts you would like to push to MyGet, or optionally create a new pipeline.
If creating a new pipeline, you can create a blank pipeline or select a pipeline template based on the type of application you are building. In this example, we will create a pipeline based on the .NET Desktop template.
Step 6. Once you have identified your pipeline or created a new pipeline, add two NuGet tasks from the list of task options on the right.
Step 7. Select the first NuGet task you just added to your pipeline, and change the “Command” configuration from “restore” to “pack.”
You can leave the fields to their default values, or change based on your specific project requirements.
Step 8. For the second NuGet task, select “push” from the “Command” dropdown. Under Target Feed Location, select “External NuGet Server (including other accounts/collections).” To point to the MyGet service connection we set up previously, simply select the service connection you saved in step 4 from the “NuGet server” dropdown. This will automatically configure your build pipeline to push your NuGet build artifact to MyGet based on the feed details you entered previously.
Step 9. Once you have updated the “Nuget push”, you are ready to run your pipeline! You can trigger your pipeline to run builds automatically based on the continuous integration settings you have previously configured, or manually trigger your pipeline to run.
You can monitor the status of the build job from your Azure DevOps Pipelines section, and review the output logs from each task in the pipeline.
Step 10. Once you build has completed, you will be able to view the artifact it produced in your MyGet feed.
Click the package link to see detailed information about the package you just pushed to MyGet, including package owners/authors, license type, download statistics, dependencies, and snippets for downloading and installing the package from MyGet in multiple systems in your development environment (such as NuGet.exe, .csproj, Paket, Chocolatey, and PowerShellGet).
YAML Snippet
Alternatively, you can configure your Azure DevOps Pipelines to push your NuGet package to MyGet with a YAML configuration file. You can add your YAML file to the root of the source code repository for your project or add an empty one from your Azure DevOps Pipeline project. See below for an example YAML snippet configured to publish a .NET Desktop NuGet package to MyGet.
Note: you will need to set up a service connection to MyGet as seen in step 4 above before attempting to run your build. Replace `` in the snippet below with the name of your MyGet service connection).
Azure devops publish nuget package Azure devops publish nuget package
[youtube]
Azure devops publish nuget package Headline news Azure devops publish nuget package
Azure devops publish nuget packageAzure devops publish nuget package Walkthrough How To Reference Release Notes Contribute NuGet How to publish NuGet Packages to MyGet from Azure DevOps Pipelines
Azure devops publish nuget package
Azure devops publish nuget package Azure devops publish nuget package Azure devops publish nuget package
SOURCE: Azure devops publish nuget package Azure devops publish nuget package Azure devops publish nuget package
#tags#[replace: -,-Azure devops publish nuget package] Azure devops publish nuget package#tags#[/b]
[b]Эдуард Кабринский[/b]
[url=http://remmont.com]new[/url]
APARTMENTlab on
[youtube]
Gene kim devops News highlights Gene kim devops
The Three Ways: The Principles Underpinning DevOpsIn this blog post, I talk about the “Three Ways,” which are the principles that all of the DevOps patterns can be derived from, which we’re using in both the “DevOps Handbook” and “The Phoenix Project: A Novel About IT, DevOps, and Helping Your Business Win.” We assert that the Three Ways describe the values and philosophies that frame the processes, procedures, practices of DevOps, as well as the prescriptive steps.
It has been especially fun working on this with fellow co-author Mike Orzen, the most recent winner of the cherished Shingo Prize for his contribution to operational excellence for his book “Lean IT.”
The Three Ways are as follows. In a future blog post, I’ll describe the DevOps patterns that can be derived from each.
The First Way emphasizes the performance of the entire system, as opposed to the performance of a specific silo of work or department — this as can be as large a division (e.g., Development or IT Operations) or as small as an individual contributor (e.g., a developer, system administrator).
The focus is on all business value streams that are enabled by IT. In other words, it begins when requirements are identified (e.g., by the business or IT), are built in Development, and then transitioned into IT Operations, where the value is then delivered to the customer as a form of a service.
The outcomes of putting the First Way into practice include never passing a known defect to downstream work centers, never allowing local optimization to create global degradation, always seeking to increase flow, and always seeking to achieve profound understanding of the system (as per Deming).
The Second Way is about creating the right to left feedback loops. The goal of almost any process improvement initiative is to shorten and amplify feedback loops so necessary corrections can be continually made.
The outcomes of the Second Way include understanding and responding to all customers, internal and external, shortening and amplifying all feedback loops, and embedding knowledge where we need it.
The Third Way is about creating a culture that fosters two things: continual experimentation, taking risks and learning from failure; and understanding that repetition and practice is the prerequisite to mastery.
We need both of these equally. Experimentation and taking risks are what ensures that we keep pushing to improve, even if it means going deeper into the danger zone than we’ve ever gone. And we need mastery of the skills that can help us retreat out of the danger zone when we’ve gone too far.
The outcomes of the Third Way include allocating time for the improvement of daily work, creating rituals that reward the team for taking risks, and introducing faults into the system to increase resilience.
In my follow-up book, The Unicorn Project, I revisit Parts Unlimited and describe my learnings through the Five Ideals.
Most Recent Articles
Comments
DM Colburn says
I applaud Gene Kim for his contribution to the DevOps transformation effort. These 3 principles offer a valuable focus for evolving the culture change requirements that are the core challenge for embedding a DevOps value system. I do have a suggestion for discussion that may serve to enhance the value of these 3 principles.
The focus on “Systems Thinking” is a concern, if we all agree that the biggest challenge to DevOps is changing current culture, values and rewards thinking. Wouldn’t the focus on developing and managing “systems” support an internal IT-centric perspective? Wouldn’t a focus on Dev and Ops co-designing “Services” better support a business-focused perspective on the value of IT? I submit that integrating the core values of DevOps into the IT Service Lifecycle would most certainly be better served by a вЂservice’ focus for the 3 principles.
For internal IT departments to remain relevant there must be a change in how the business values IT. IT must evolve from a вЂcost center’ or вЂspend-only’ department, to a вЂservice provider’ or вЂcontributing’ department. To be successful IT must be capable of demonstrating value in the same way, and at the same valuation points business departments use to demonstrate their value (i.e. optimizing business process.)
Business department leaders are inherently familiar with and experienced in quantifying (valuing) вЂservices’. вЂSystems’ on the other hand, are more
commonly recognized as the purview of IT or manufacturing-related departments. Manufacturing-related departments however, have evolved a more mature capability to quantify their value in support of core business process. IT departments are struggling to evolve this same capability.
DevOps is a critical paradigm shift required for IT to evolve the capability to value its services in a way business department leaders understand. Building serviceability, availability, reliability and service level quantifiability into the business process automation services IT designs, transitions, operates and continually improves, requires integrating development and operations as a single discipline functioning in all phases of the Service Lifecycle.
For this reason I wonder if it would be more вЂIT Transformation’ supportive to include the concept of DevOps co-developing services as a core principal, avoiding the possibility the вЂsystems’ perspective in the First Way above, would be seen as perpetuating the internal IT focus for DevOps, as opposed to a business-focused вЂservice’ perspective.
My intent is to facilitate discussions on this point, to enhance, not be critical of the value Gene has offered with these principles.
Hi DM, you are certainly a better politician than I am. Though I don’t “want” to be critical, I think the discussion could be most useful if we are presented a view that while acknowledges the вЂpotential’ of the вЂThree Ways’, it focuses a bit more on what it is we are trying to вЂtransform’, why it is seen as вЂbroken’, and what are perhaps the вЂreal’ cultural and financial reasons for it being вЂbroken’ and in need of вЂtransformation’ in the first place.
DevOps facilitates the process by building (via code) the conduits between the developer and customers through вЂcontinual integration’; connectivity between вЂmonitoring triggers and events’ and the organization’s вЂticketing’ systems; and advanced configuration management and/or complete вЂcontainerization’ of deployable environments, among other job descriptors. Operations just needs get on board and/or get out of the way.
I know a lot about DevOps because that is what I and my company do for many large and small organizations. And, we are paid quite well for our efforts. And, I don’t want to bite the hand that feeds me. But, a lot of what I do is so successful and/or so вЂnecessary’ partially due to failed politics and/or the organization’s lacking or non-existent procedures: not necessarily due to the вЂstrength’ of the вЂThree Ways’ or any other philosophical sound bites.
To the extent that “DevOps” can be viewed as вЂgetting Operations to be more like Development’, then we understand why the nature of the вЂService Desk’ has become replaced by on an automated and/or вЂSelf-Service’ model. Developers rely on user/customer feedback and restful вЂPUT’ of crash and stack trace output into a вЂcontinual improvement system’, whereby defects can be detected, presumably corrected, and released back to the customer in record time.
If only through sheer numbers, and given their equal weight in the discussion, start-ups and smaller companies with fewer products, few, if any вЂmission critical customer services’, fewer processes and employees, who adopt the вЂAgile’ method, can point to quick development and few вЂcatastrophic’ failures as proof their вЂThree Ways’ end-to-end, continual feedback, risk taking and reward yielding culture is an unwavering success.
Larger organizations with significant multiples in the number of products and employees, and a few absolutely вЂmission critical’ services only need to вЂonboard’ this leaner DevOps mentality and their IT will be sufficiently вЂtransformed’.
In the вЂFirst Way’, I am a strong believer in the IT professional’s need to understand their вЂsystem’, or ecosystem, from end-to-end. However, as the number of ecosystems grow along with complexity of each ecosystem, the advantage and/or sustainability of any single person or group вЂunderstanding’ each and every ecosystem at a sufficiently вЂproficient’ level becomes daunting, at best. Thus, larger organizations begin to pare down the expectations as to вЂwhat to know’, and the ability therefore to determine вЂdefects’ or вЂdegradation’ in others’ ecosystems becomes haphazard, at best.
In the вЂSecond Way’, a fully staffed and functioning Service Desk can act as a clearinghouse of feedback from systems, developers, testers, operators and end-users. However, the difficulty, both politically and economically, of implementing such a Service Desk continues to be a major impediment to providing timely and accurate feedback for larger and smaller organizations.
Mostly from the cultural and political spheres: boutique developers and their product managers “can’t be bothered” with complaints and system faults when it is not directly related to their product’s offerings. And, getting вЂproof’ of that relationship is not always: it requires said developers and managers to agree to investigate in an honest and open manner and to admit fault when it is found.
Thus, the Service Desk’s deciphering and escalating critical issues are often left to those without the proper skill set, knowledge of the many systems, or political authority to execute on their mission, making their вЂlack of effectiveness’ a self-fulfilling prophecy. Again, this lends unfair credence to the notion that the automated and вЂself-service’ model is the only reliable and cost effective feedback model.
In the вЂThird Way’, I won’t even discuss here whether an effective вЂchange management’ system could not only mitigate risk, but could eliminate the need for вЂrisk taking’ entirely. I will touch on whether your electronic check deposit should be considered with the same вЂweight’ of service responsibility as, say, your вЂFacebook like’ of your Mexican dinner, or say, a successful Uber reservation for a car service.
Obviously, being able to discover and overcome the вЂunknown’ in a timely manner requires taking on some risks. But, the risk that some вЂFacebook likes’ are missed is entirely different than the risks that some вЂbank deposits’ aren’t made.
Not dwelling on exactly what we mean by risk, I’d also argue that, again, quite frankly, only the вЂDeveloper’ can gain by risk taking. And, this is a cultural phenomenon found in both вЂnon-Transformed’ and вЂfully Transformed’ IT shops. More accurately, the risk/reward system is only geared towards rewarding the Developer. The only вЂrisk’ Operations can take that doesn’t backfire is to say вЂNo’, so she might live to see another day.
When Developers take risks that fail, it merely appears that something that was previously broken is not fixed; or a new вЂfeature’ is not yet available. The Developer will get another crack, or two, at it, or as many as needed until the вЂthingy’ works. Yet, Operations has to deal with the added inconvenience and risks associated with maintaining the faulty product. When Developers finally вЂget it right’, they get all the accolades. All Operations gets is a little less headache and less risk in maintaining the product and the financial and hierarchical benefits likewise, flow to the Development groups and rarely to Operations..
When Operations takes risks that fail, customers lose confidence in the product, the organization loses business, and people lose their jobs. When Operations takes risks that are successful, the accolades flow to the Developer for вЂcoming up with the solution’, and the financial and hierarchical benefits likewise, flow to the Development groups and rarely to Operations.
Thus, the вЂreal’ reason why DevOps is a success, at least partially, is that we are now seeing вЂdevelopers’ in the Operations role. And, now engineering and product managers have a certain vested interest in their вЂDeveloper Operator’ in a manner they never had before in their вЂSystem Administrator Operator’. I’d say the only and persistent gap continues to be in rewarding (compensation of) the risk takers: DevOps engineers have fared only marginally better than their Administrator Operator predecessors.
To conclude, I am all for вЂAgile’ and the вЂThree Ways’. They are exciting and promising ways of approaching IT and Service delivery. However, the day Operators and Service Desk staff are compensated like Developers; and the day the Service Desk is staffed with actual Developers and top-notch вЂDevOps’ engineers: that is the the day the вЂThree Ways’ can be anything other than a quaint notion befitting a startup with few products and no mission critical services.
Erick Hagstrom says
You seem to conflate “Systems Thinking” with the “systems” that IT builds, maintains and operates. In fact, “systems thinking” is a discipline completely distinct from IT, and the systems about which we think are frequently human in nature. Wikipedia can give you a good start in understanding the meaning of “Systems Thinking”, though the Waters Foundation does it more succinctly: http://watersfoundation.org/systems-thinking/what/.
I noticed “tools” were not one of the ways. Comments anyone? I’ll look for other articles on the tools versus process/culture topic as well.
Steve Speicher says
Tools only help (or hurt) with the 3 principles. If you consider for example the 3rd principle, many customers would look for tools/products/solutions to help with this experimentation and repetitiveness. The simple way I would think of this is by leveraging a simple and fast way to onboard developers, such a Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) like OpenShift. In addition, it allows for native continuous integration and deployment (repetitive). These can be enhanced by a number of 3rd part systems such as Jenkins, Shippable, ContinuousCI, etc
imno haree says
These references are only for the advanced. They are highly cryptic and you must provide your credit card details for the secrets of DevOps and other secrets of the universe to exposed to you in all their glory. Please first read the Phoenix Project for amateur standard DevOps before you can decode the black art contained within these links.
jual crystal x di depok feel grateful to find an article about this DevOps
Jason McSpacin says
ironically we are not grateful for jual crystal x di depok at all. In fact i’d liken it to SpamOps, which is a very well practiced craft for polluting the internet and trying to sell us crap that would never really be delivered anyway.
This article has given a little more knowledge of the jual crystal x di depok surrounding The Principles underpinning DevOps
Jock Spicer says
i found the link above only gave me the first way and therefore is not true devops.
I am now reading the first chapter of “The DevOps Toolkit”. And this term that Gene really loves “The Three Ways” appears all over. First, it is not the same as described here – since if I understand correctly System Thinking was changed with Flow.
Here and there in the text appears “First Way”, “Second Way”, “Third Way”, bla bla … I just think it is a very very poor choice to refer to named principles like this. I never remember what does first/second/third mean and it is very distracting. In most of the other books that I actually learned a lot from, there are distinct names for principles – and these names are used and re-used without giving them numbers or letters or whatever, unless their initials fit well into an acronym.
Would you agree that Gene needs to follow each Way Number with its name, or am I just being unreasonable?
Erick Hagstrom says
I agree that “First Way”, etc. is not a very helpful naming convention. It’s like naming your variables A1, A2, etc. (Excuse me a moment while I shudder at the memory of having to produce working code in BASIC.)
As for the First Way, both the formulations you mention are equivalent. Systems Thinking is all about optimizing the system, streamlining it, making it more reliable, etc. Improving it. What happens when you do those things to a system that manages the “Flow” of work from business needs to services that deliver business value? You end up optimizing the flow, streamlining it, making it more reliable, etc. Improving it. Systems Thinking is how you approach the system, better Flow is the result of improving it.
I agree. And in fact, I have already begun to translate the “three ways” in my head into the following 3 words he uses for them:Flow, Feedback, Experimentation. But I may modify that based on the excellent comment by @erick_hagstrom:disqus . Maybe I’ll say System Thinking, Feedback, Experimentation. Anything is better than learning a new trinity. That feels like joining a cult. And I don’t like cults. I don’t want to get my teams to drink the coolaid. I want them to think and learn. But I do like the authors and their ideas. So I’m not throwing the baby out with the bathwater. I’m just going to downplay the “Three Ways” thing. Thanks for highlighting this. It was bugging me too, but I had not examined it until you replied.
Bennett Elder says
Scientists have no trouble referring to Newton’s 3 laws of motion directly by number. Surely us business and tech people that have port numbers and command line syntax and acronyms memorized can remember the three ways to accomplish the Goal.
It took me a bit to learn them. The book that The Phoenix Project is based on, The Goal by Eliyahu M. Goldratt, helped a great deal. It is a bit corny at times… but it’s a great way to solidify the concepts of the three ways.
“The Phoenix Project” seems to imply that “security” is nothing but an a roadblock. Might this book have been written a few years ago before the world realized that security has been an afterthought…if any thought was put into it at all?
My impression of the book was that security put efforts on regulatory compliance issues that did not need solving on it side. DevOPS on the other hand encourages that security is everyone’s concern. My impression.
The Phoenix Project framed security not as a set of regulations that needed to follow, but rather a sort of value that needed to be delivered. Security testing and compliance was not a list of boxes to check off, but rather followed the same ideas and processes practiced throughout the book. Those boxes still need to be checked off from a legal standpoint, of course. But from an industry(ial) standpoint, security needs to be treated and tested just like normal code, and is as much a piece of value as the UI is.
The biggest challenge no one has mentioned, at least as far as I read in the comments is your customers. It’s all very well being able to iterate quickly, but in my experience customers never want to put that much effort in. They are all about doing the job they are paid to do that just happens to use the software your wrote and provided. We release on a steady scheduled 8 week cycle a new test version and allow 3 weeks for customers to test and feedback, followed by a new build for penetration testing and then a week after an RTM build for production. I can tell you that we are extremely lucky to get more than 1 customer who will actively feedback during the allotted 3 week period despite the dates for all versions within the year being known upfront. Of course when it goes RTM all customers want to install it on their test system first before going live with it.
Brian Wawok says
This is the wonder of SaaS. You just upgrade every day. The user had no choice ?? 8 week cycles for desktop software is just too slow.
…or you upgrade your desktop software automatically, like Google Chrome or Spotify.
That’s not the way businesses work. Consumer software like chrome sure, but where you have to upgrade a database before pushing the software and the customer will not accept that in production before they have tried it on their test system it’s a complete other ball gave. I’d love to say rough just have the latest and we’ll release a new version to fix any issues is simply not something that business will accept.
A lot of businesses today who buy into a SAAS model do accept it.
Take Salesforce.com for example. Major upgrades are pushed three times a year, period. Patch upgrades are deploy at least once a week. As far as I know, there is no way to opt out.
Migrating existing products to a SAAS model when there is already low-trust could certainly be a problem, but a great many businesses will and do accept the model, when presented properly.
As the original poster said, customers never want to put that much effort in — but trust is essential.
I guess these people have never worked in local government before then.
I agree to Peter. Other than core IT businesses like salesforce, chrome etc, there is lot of resistance from customers for every week or every month upgrade. Idealistically, process works but practically challenges in government are numerous
Aaron Surty says
I completely agree. I wish there was a handbook for ISVs writing enterprise software for on premise use.
It is web software not desktop. For desktop software it would be mega fast. You are thinking of things like a browser, but business customers and business software there is no way they will go that fast.
As a SaaS provider telcos also have issues accepting direct to live software changes. not least as no SaaS testing is done in the same e2e environment and where the client is the ultimate responsible of the service level to the end customer. What ends up happening is continuous testing that has significant extra costs.
Brian Turnwald says
I’ve found the best way to get feedback to to proactively ask for it in person or on a call. When I email or put something “out there” and ask them to test, it never gets done. Customers love to provide feedback, but don’t make them work for it. Make it easy!
Thank you for sharing this model. I will adapt it for our social innovation project to learn resolving generational poverty in a durable manner. Armentekort.be
Gary Williams says
This article annoys me. Why? Because it’s 100% right and yet devops today is associated with automation, the cloud and “devops engineers”. Not one of them understands the three ways.
I just transitioned away from a “DevOps Engineer” role because not only was it not these three ways, it wasn’t even your “automation, the cloud…”, it was just Operations++
Gary Williams says
“operations++” – I like that phrase. I hope you don’t mind if I steal it for use in meetings?
Bennett Elder says
Operations++? So like a Site Reliability Engineer just getting started, before they start statistically analyzing log data? ??
That reeducation is part of the journey. I’m constantly having to show that it is a cultural and technical mindset, not a specific role or tool.
Bennett Elder says
That’s mainly because people associate the buzzword with concepts they’ve been fed by marketers, not by practitioners in the field. Uncertain yet if MS renaming their collaboration and work delivery tool as Azure DevOps is going to hurt or to help matters. So far it’s at least seemed like a boon to my quest to spread these practices and concepts where I work.
Btw, this page has been one of my startup tabs for longer than I can remember. It regrounds me in the concepts I need to use in the coming day. Probably the closest I’ve gotten to meditation anytime recently.
I don’t see why DevOps would exclude proactive automation and simplification. Peter Merel calls these The Zeroth Way Of DevOps.
Nilesh Thali says
Six years late to the party, but… are these really three “ways” or three layers/steps? Three ways imply three different paths to getting to the same thing.
Johny Thinker says
I’m also conflicting a bit with that issue. English is not my native language, perhaps it makes sense for a English native?
Bennett Elder says
They are three steps. Without thinking about the 1st way, the 2nd way can lead to local optimizations that don’t have an important impact on the whole system. The continual experimentation and learning of the 3rd way requires the shorter feedback loops of the 2nd way. It’s something that’s meant to be thought of in steps for sure.
George Nicholson III says
I’m reading the Phoenix Project now and find this fascinating. I’ve had execs asking me about implementing “DevOps tools and processes” and I keep telling them that DevOps is more about adopting and committing to a culture and set of values than just tools and processes to add to your disfunctional IT area. The “3 ways” are presented in such a lofty and philosophical way, like guidance from a Kung Fu master, which makes it difficult to sell to corporate execs who want to check boxes and measure the results of precise action plans rather than change their thinking.
Bennett Elder says
I really like the Capabilities to Drive Improvement section in Accelerate (https://itrevolution.com/book/accelerate/). It outlines exactly which practices folllow the 3 ways and are shown to improve IT performance.
Thanks, for the article Gene. IMHO there is still huge human factor impact here you cannot well automate..
Natalie Sanelyte | Digital Reviewer | easybuilder.pro
Thanks for the information regarding Devops
Amazing write up, never read such an informative blog and enjoyed it. Thankyou. Keep up the good work. Looking forward to read more.
it is written very nicely and is optimized
Nice Information for me And I hope you would write the next article.
Keep doing awesome. Looking forward read more.
feel appreciative to discover an article about this DevOps
Nice Article and hope to keep writing again. thanks so much for sharing this article.
Really Very Informative Post , Thanks For Sharing The Information With Us.
Thanks For Sharing The Information regards, vesti dana.
Thanks for sharing the best information for me.
Very Nice Article and hope to keep sharing more information and once again thank You so much for sharing this article.
Gene kim devops Gene kim devops
[youtube]
Gene kim devops New Gene kim devops
Gene kim devopsThe Three Ways: The Principles Underpinning DevOps In this blog post, I talk about the “Three Ways,” which are the principles that all of the DevOps patterns can be derived from, which we’re
Gene kim devops
Gene kim devops Gene kim devops Gene kim devops
SOURCE: Gene kim devops Gene kim devops Gene kim devops
#tags#[replace: -,-Gene kim devops] Gene kim devops#tags#[/b]
[b]Eduard Kabrinskiy[/b]
[url=http://remmont.com]today’s news headlines[/url]
Fremontlab on
[b]Эдуард Кабринский – Elk devops – Kabrinskiy Eduard
Elk devops[youtube]
Elk devops News today Elk devops
Jenkins Log Monitoring With ELKIn this article, we demonstrated Jenkins log and Job builds log monitoring using Filebeat and ELK Stack greater visibility, tracking, and monitoring.
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.
Purpose
A build log of a Jenkins Job contains a full set of records for a job, including the build name, number, execution time, the result (success or fail), and other things.
In this article, we have demonstrated Jenkins log and Job builds log monitoring using Filebeat and ELK Stack greater visibility, tracking, and monitoring.
Filebeat will ship the Jenkins logs to Elasticsearch for indexing and then we can see it in Kibana Dashboard.
In this tutorial, we are going to install and configure Jenkins, Elasticsearch, Filebeat, and Kibana and configure them on Ubuntu 16.04 to demonstrate this.
The installation packages may differ in the case of other Ubuntu versions.
Jenkins
It is an open-source automation server that can be used to automate tasks related to build, test, deliver, deploying projects.
Installation
You need to follow the below steps to install Jenkins in Ubuntu 16.04
Step1: Add the repository key to the system
wget -q -O – https://pkg.jenkins.io/debian/jenkins-ci.org.key
| sudo apt-key add –
Step2: Add the Jenkins source to the server source list
echo deb https://pkg.jenkins.io/debian-stable binary/
| sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jenkins.list
Step3: Run an update to use the new repository
sudo apt-get update
Step4: Install Jenkins and dependencies
sudo apt-get install jenkins
Start and Status Check of Jenkins Server
Use systemctl for start/stop Jenkins instance.
sudo systemctl start jenkins.service
sudo systemctl stop jenkins.service
sudo systemctl status
Access and Setup Jenkins in Browser
Open your browser and you can access Jenkins by using either IP Address http://ipaddess:8080
Jenkins by default runs on a port 8080.
At the start, you will get an “Unlock Jenkins” screen.
You can find your initial password under “/var/lib/jenkins/secrets/initialAdminPassword”.
Login to the server command prompt (using putty or other tools) and do a cat on the above file to get the password.
Put the password in the “Administrator Password” field in the browser and click on the Continue button.
Next page select/click on “Install suggested plugins” option and it will start the Jenkins plugin installation.
Once the installation process is complete, you will get a prompt to Create First Admin user and password and click on Save and Finish.
Your Jenkins is up and ready to use.
Configure JDK and Maven
To configure JDK and Maven globally for any project build, you can configure then under the Global Tool Configuration in Jenkins.
Log in to Jenkins and click on Manage Jenkins
Then click on Global Tool Configuration and configure any build tools you.
Below you can see how to configure JDK and Maven. You can use a similar approach to configure the other build tools, like Gradle or ANT
JDK Configure
Click on the Add JDK button under JDK and then put your JAVA_HOME (The JDK installation directory in your server)
Maven Configure
Click on the Add Maven button under Maven and then put your MAVEN_HOME (The MAVEN installation directory in your server)
Click on the Apply button at the end of the page to save the above setting.
Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch is a search engine based on the Lucene library. Elasticsearch is developed in Java.
Installation
You need to follow the below steps to install elastic search
Step1: Add the repository key to the system
wget -qO – https://artifacts.elastic.co/GPG-KEY-elasticsearch
| sudo apt-key add –
Step2: Add the Elastic source to the server source list
echo “deb https://artifacts.elastic.co/packages/6.x/apt stable main”
| sudo tee -a /etc/apt/sources.list.d/elastic-6.×.list
Step3: Run an update to use the new repository
sudo apt-get update
Step4: Install Elasticsearch
sudo apt-get install elasticsearch
Configure Elasticsearch
After Elasticsearch installation is complete, we need to open elasticsearch.yml under “/etc/elasticsearch” and configure network.host property.
You can set it a network.host: localhost
You can set it as network.host: 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0 IP address will bind to all network interfaces)
Start Server and Test
Now you can restart the elastic search instance by sudo service elasticsearch start
Elastic search by default runs on 9200 port. You can test your elastic search is up and running by doing a CURL or hitting the http:// :9200/ URL in your browser.
It will give you a response something like this mentioned below,
Elk devops Elk devops
[youtube]
Elk devops Today news live Elk devops
Elk devopsIn this article, we demonstrated Jenkins log and Job builds log monitoring using Filebeat and ELK Stack greater visibility, tracking, and monitoring.
Elk devops
Elk devops Elk devops Elk devops
SOURCE: Elk devops Elk devops Elk devops
#tags#[replace: -,-Elk devops] Elk devops#tags#[/b]
[b]Kabrinskiy Eduard[/b]
[url=http://remmont.com]new[/url]
Vlogovdiubs on
Interesting porn comics are in trend now. More and more men all over the Asia are interested in cartoon porn. If you desire to find the best incest porn with comics, you must to visit the helpful link. One of the honest websites with sex comics is Mult34.
At mult34.com you can search various categories of comic porn. Some persons in Europe and the USA are interesting to watch in free adult time interesting porn videos. Usually, classical porn is not absorbing for men. That is the main reason why guys are interested in new comic videos.
At link [url=https://mult34.com/tag/ochaco-uraraka/]uraraka porn[/url] you may search and sea videos about lily loud. Currently mult porn is already used by iOs or Android. Further, you may know that ashe porn comics have already been well known in China and Finland. If you do not know about uber porn, at a website you may find all the important data about it.
Very principal heroes like spider gwen hentai are very cool in porn videos. All comics with enormous heroes are very nice. Consequently, you should know that at a link probable to find spider porn. Unusual cartoons with resident evil porn-watching students in dormitories. One of the most shorts videos is shota porn and romilda vane. There were however some mute videos. One of the non-standard videos is the loud house porn.
Any of young wives are interested in sex with toys. A different moment in videos proposes users familiarize themselves with nice toys. Some men prefer to click on different videos and find comics with large muscles. Today’s amazing world of gumball porn gets a chance to see different short and long videos. If users do not know where to choose videos with breastfeeding porn, better to go to the link.
At the website, there are more and more cool videos. If you desire to observe to Simpsons hentai, it is however probable. Nowadays the last of us porn videos look on mobile. Also, men prefer to watch comic videos on tablets. Some links do not provide porn cause of in their regions – forbidden porn.
Any of porn materials it is feasible to find after 18 years of age. On the link gender, bender hentai comics added every month. If you wish to search comics and then undertale sex, you could search the best of the comics on the website. In addition, there is some interesting porn comic’s video in Japan.
Besides, clients can discover videos with nationwide symbolism. At directories, there are cool unusual films like slime girl porn; avenger’s porn; rapunzel porn, and etc. Comics that are more new you should search here [url=https://mult34.com/category/my-hero-academia/]my hero academia hentai[/url] at the link.
Tardovbat on
Оригинальные сумочки привлекают всех молодых женщин. С ними привычно отправляться в дорогу, ездить в машине. Они с удобствами и компактные, в них оптимально положить всё самое нужно: внешний аккумулятор, гель для бровей, мини гигиенические принадлежности.
На marcjacobs-russia.com любой человек подберет для себя отличный вариант. На портале размещено большое количество разных сумочек, а также модельных сумок бежевого и пурпурного цвета. Купить сумку Marc Jacobs есть возможность теперь и в интернете.
Любая дама сможет выбрать для себя сумочку, с которой есть возможность идти в клуб. Среди наиболее топовых моделей сегодня считается модель Marc Jacobs Snapshot Dusty lilac Multi, которая в тренде из-за своих параметров. Очень известной также есть и модель сумки Marc Jacobs Snapshot Porcelain Multi, которая является лидером продаж года.
На веб-ресурсе организации есть опция найти много разных вариантов. Кое-каким девушкам по вкусу сумочки коричневого цвета, такие доступны на веб-странице тоже. Если вам интересны габаритные сумки, в которых доступен кармашек – несколько моделей таких сумочек есть. Официальный сайт фирмы Marc Jacobs, который работает в РФ, поможет любому человеку выбрать отличный вариант для себя.
Если вы не знаете, что подарить любимой на День Рождения, вы сможете в сжатые сроки подобрать для неё интересующий вариант. Прилично качественных и стильных сумок [url=https://marcjacobs-russia.com/]Marc Jacobs[/url] сейчас доступны в нашем интернет-магазине. Сетевой shop безупречно зарекомендовал себя и в связи с этим огромный процент женщин покупают разные сумочки на нём.
Как известно, фирма Marc Jacobs уже давно представлена как компания премиум-класса. Именно из-за этого все сумочки этого бренда считаются роскошью и безупречно сочетаются с разными видами моды. Вы можете надеть сумочку Marc Jacobs с новыми часами Casio или Apple Watch. Хорошим дополнением для каждой женщины будет сумочка на ремешке.
Так как сейчас достаточно парней предпочитают одевать стильные вещи, много женщин хочет выглядеть также модно. Сумочки бренда Marc Jacobs помогут им в этом, к тому же сейчас они доступны на сайте интернет-магазина женских сумок [url=https://marcjacobs-russia.com/]Marc Jacobs[/url] по скидке.
При интересе вы можете забрать товар по адресу г. Москва, Комсомольский проспект 25 к1 или связаться с центральной компанией по телефону +18777076272. Менеджеры ответят на любые ваши вопросы, и вы сможете выбрать не только сумочку, но и рюкзак при необходимости. Выбор моделей на ресурсе компании просто огромный, все сумочки хорошо прошиты и стильные.
latishall4 on
Young Heaven – Naked Teens & Young Porn Pictures
models used by porn company ddf hard cowgirl porn fired for marrying a porn star free hores porn videos what is tentacle pornhttp://sexypantyporn.androidpornpics.alypics.com/?tina
booje on
Заказать seo поисковую оптимизацию сайта, Заказать услуги по продвижению сайта По всем возникшим вопросам Вы можете обратиться в скайп логин [b]pokras7777[/b]Раскрутка сайта под ключ
.Так же собираем базы Обратесь всегда будем рабы вам помочь [url=https://seoprofisional.ru]наша группа в телеграмме[/url]
booje on
Заказать seo поисковую оптимизацию сайта, Заказать услуги по продвижению сайта По всем возникшим вопросам Вы можете обратиться в скайп логин [b]pokras7777[/b]Раскрутка сайта под ключ
.Так же собираем базы Обратесь всегда будем рабы вам помочь [url=https://seoprofisional.ru]наша группа в телеграмме[/url]
Racmobat on
Модные сумочки привлекают сегодня молодых женщин. С ними на руку отправляться в дорогу, ездить в машине. Они комфортные и компактные, в них оптимально положить всё самое необходимое: внешний аккумулятор, гель для бровей, мини гигиенические принадлежности.
На marcjacobs-russia.com любой клиент сможет найти для себя отличный вариант. На ресурсе достаточно большое количество разных сумочек, а также модельных сумок серого и пурпурного цвета. Заказать сумку Marc Jacobs есть возможность теперь и в интернете.
Любая девушка сможет выбрать для себя сумку, с которой реально идти в night club. Среди наиболее топовых моделей сейчас считается модель Marc Jacobs Logo Strap Snapshot New Black Multi, которая ценится из-за своих параметров. Очень прикольной также есть и модель сумки Marc Jacobs Snapshot Porcelain Multi, которая считается лидером продаж года.
На сайте организации есть возможность найти много симпатичных вариантов. Кое-каким студенткам по вкусу сумочки коричневого цвета, такие есть на портале тоже. Если вам нравятся габаритные сумки, в которых доступен карман – несколько моделей таких сумок есть. Официальный портал компании Marc Jacobs, который работает в России, поможет любому человеку выбрать интересный вариант для себя.
Если вы не имеете представления, что подарить любимой на День Рождения, вы сможете в сжатые сроки подобрать для себя интересующий вариант. Большое количество качественных и новых сумок [url=https://marcjacobs-russia.com/]Marc Jacobs[/url] сегодня доступны в нашем интернет-магазине. Сетевой shop хорошо зарекомендовал себя и в связи с этим огромный процент женщин заказывают разные сумочки на нём.
В основном, фирма Marc Jacobs уже давно представлена как фирма премиум-класса. Именно из-за этого все сумки этого бренда являются роскошью и безупречно сочетаются с разными видами моды. Вы можете надеть сумочку Marc Jacobs с роскошными часами Casio или Apple Watch. Хорошим дополнением для каждой женщины будет сумочка на ремне.
Так как в эти дни много парней предпочитают носить стильные вещи, огромное количество девушек хочет выглядеть также стильно. Сумочки компании Marc Jacobs помогут им в этом, к тому же сейчас они доступны на ресурсе фирмы женских сумок [url=https://marcjacobs-russia.com/]Marc Jacobs[/url] по скидке.
При интересе вы можете забрать заказ по адресу г. Москва, Комсомольский проспект 25 к1 или связаться с главным офисом по телефону +18777076272. Менеджеры ответят на любые ваши вопросы, и вы сможете выбрать не только сумочку, но и рюкзак при возможности. Выбор моделей на сайте компании просто колоссальный, все сумочки качественные и стильные.